Building a GitHub Action with Docker

While I was investigating Kyverno, I wanted to check my Kubernetes deployments for compliance with Kyverno policies. The Kyverno CLI can be used to do that with the following command:

kyverno apply ./policies --resource=./deploy/deployment.yaml

To do this easily from a GitHub workflow, I created an action called gbaeke/kyverno-cli. The action uses a Docker container. It can be used in a workflow as follows:

# run kyverno cli and use v1 instead of v1.0.0
- name: Validate policies
  uses: gbaeke/kyverno-action@v1
    command: |
      kyverno apply ./policies --resource=./deploy/deployment.yaml

You can find the full workflow here. In the next section, we will take a look at how you build such an action.

If you want a video instead, here it is:

GitHub Actions

A GitHub Action is used inside a GitHub workflow. An action can be built with Javascript or with Docker. To use an action in a workflow, you use uses: followed by a reference to the action, which is just a GitHub repository. In the above action, we used uses: gbaeke/kyverno-action@v1. The repository is gbaeke/kyverno-action and the version is v1. The version can refer to a release but also a branch. In this case v1 refers to a branch. In a later section, we will take a look at versioning with releases and branches.

Create a repository

An action consists of several files that live in a git repository. Go ahead and create such a repository on GitHub. I presume you know how to do that. We will add several files to it:

  • Dockerfile and all the files that are needed to build the Docker image
  • action.yml: to set the name of our action, its description, inputs and outputs and how it should run

Docker image

Remember that we want a Docker image that can run the Kyverno CLI. That means we have to include the CLI in the image that we build. In this case, we will build the CLI with Go as instructed on Here is the Dockerfile (should be in the root of your git repo):

FROM golang:1.15
COPY src/ /
RUN git clone
WORKDIR kyverno
RUN make cli
RUN mv ./cmd/cli/kubectl-kyverno/kyverno /usr/bin/kyverno

We start from a golang image because we need the go tools to build the executable. The result of the build is the kyverno executable in /usr/bin. The Docker image uses a shell script as its entrypoint, We copy that shell script from the src folder in our repository.

So go ahead and create the src folder and add a file called Here is the script:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
set -o pipefail
echo ">>> Running command"
echo ""
bash -c "set -e;  set -o pipefail; $1"

This is just a bash script. We use the set commands in the main script to ensure that, when an error occurs, the script exits with the exit code from the command or pipeline that failed. Because we want to run a command like kyverno apply, we need a way to execute that. That’s why we run bash again at the end with the same options and use $1 to represent the argument we will pass to our container. Our GitHub Action will need a way to require an input and pass that input as the argument to the Docker container.

Note: make sure the script is executable; use chmod +x

The action.yml

Action.yml defines our action and should be in the root of the git repo. Here is the action.yml for our Docker action:

name: 'kyverno-action'
description: 'Runs kyverno cli'
  icon: 'command'
  color: 'red'
    description: 'kyverno command to run'
    required: true
  using: 'docker'
  image: 'Dockerfile'
    - ${{ inputs.command }}

Above, we give the action a name and description. We also set an icon and color. The icon and color is used on the GitHub Marketplace:

command icon and color as defined in action.yml (note that this is the REAL action; in this post we call the action kyverno-action as an example)

As stated earlier, we need to pass arguments to the container when it starts. To achieve that, we define a required input to the action. The input is called command but you can use any name.

In the run: section, we specify that this action uses Docker. When you use image: Dockerfile, the workflow will build the Docker image for you with a random name and then run it for you. When it runs the container, it passes the command input as an argument with args: Multiple arguments can be passed, but we only pass one.

Note: the use of a Dockerfile makes running the action quite slow because the image needs to be built every time the action runs. In a moment, we will see how to fix that.

Verify that the image works

On your machine that has Docker installed, build and run the container to verify that you can run the CLI. Run the commands below from the folder containing the Dockerfile:

docker build -t DOCKER_HUB_USER/kyverno-action:v1.0.0 .

docker run DOCKER_HUB_USER/kyverno-action:v1.0.0 "kyverno version"

Above, I presume you have an account on Docker Hub so that you can later push the image to it. Substitute DOCKER_HUB_USER with your Docker Hub username. You can of course use any registry you want.

The result of docker run should be similar to the result below:

>>> Running command

Version: v1.3.5-rc2-1-g3ab75095
Time: 2021-04-04_01:16:49AM
Git commit ID: main/3ab75095b70496bde674a71df08423beb7ba5fff

Note: if you want to build a specific version of the Kyverno CLI, you will need to modify the Dockerfile; the instructions I used build the latest version and includes release candidates

If docker run was successful, push the image to Docker Hub (or your registry):

docker push DOCKER_HUB_USER/kyverno-action:v1.0.0

Note: later, it will become clear why we push this container to a public registry

Publish to the marketplace

You are now ready to publish your action to the marketplace. One thing to be sure of is that the name of your action should be unique. Above, we used kyverno-action. When you run through the publishing steps, GitHub will check if the name is unique.

To see how to publish the action, check the following video:

video starts at the marketplace publishing step

Note that publishing to the marketplace is optional. Our action can still be used without it being published. Publishing just makes our action easier to discover.

Using the action

At this point, you can already use the action when you specify the exact release version. In the video, we created a release called v1.0.0 and optionally published it. The snippet below illustrates its use:

- name: Validate policies
  uses: gbaeke/kyverno-action@v1.0.0
    command: |
      kyverno apply ./policies --resource=./deploy/deployment.yaml

Running this action results in a docker build, followed by a docker run in the workflow:

The build step takes quite some time, which is somewhat annoying. Let’s fix that! In addition, we will let users use v1 instead of having to specify v1.0.0 or v1.0.1 etc…

Creating a v1 branch

By creating a branch called v1 and modifying action.yml to use a Docker image from a registry, we can make the action quicker and easier to use. Just create a branch in GitHub and call it v1. We’ll use the UI:

create the branch here; if it does not exist there will be a create option (here it exists already)

Make the v1 branch active and modify action.yml:

In action.yml, instead of image: ‘Dockerfile’, use the following:

image: 'docker://DOCKER_HUB_USER/kyverno-action:v1.0.0'

When you use the above statement, the image will be pulled instead of built from scratch. You can now use the action with @v1 at the end:

# run kyverno cli and use v1 instead of v1.0.0
- name: Validate policies
  uses: gbaeke/kyverno-action@v1
    command: |
      kyverno apply ./policies --resource=./deploy/deployment.yaml

In the worflow logs, you will see:

The action now pulls the image from Docker Hub and later runs it


We can conclude that building GitHub Actions with Docker is quick and fun. You can build your action any way you want, using the tools you like. Want to create a tool with Go, or Python or just Bash… just do it! If you do want to build a GitHub Action with JavaScript, then be sure to check out this article on

Azure Policy for Kubernetes: Contraints and ConstraintTemplates

In one on my videos on my YouTube channel, I talked about Kubernetes authentication and used the image below:

Securing access to the Kubernetes API Server

To secure access to the Kubernetes API server, you need to be authenticated and properly authorized to do what you need to do. The third mechanism to secure access is admission control. Simply put, admission control allows you to inspect requests to the API server and accept or deny the request based on rules you set. You will need an admission controller, which is just code that intercepts the request after authentication and authorization.

There is a list of admission controllers that are compiled-in with two special ones (check the docs):

  • MutatingAdmissionWebhook
  • ValidatingAdmissionWebhook

With the two admission controllers above, you can develop admission plugins as extensions and configure them at runtime. In this post, we will look at a ValidatingAdmissionWebhook that is used together with Azure Policy to inspect requests to the AKS API Server and either deny or audit these requests.

Note that I already have a post about Azure Policy and pod security policies here. There is some overlap between that post and this one. In this post, we will look more closely at what happens on the cluster.

Want a video instead?

Azure Policy

Azure has its own policy engine to control the Azure Resource Manager (ARM) requests you can make. A common rule in many organizations for instance is the prohibition of creation of expensive resources or even creating resources in unapproved regions. For example, a European company might want to only create resources in West Europe or North Europe. Azure Policy is the engine that can enforce such a rule. For more information, see Overview of Azure Policy. In short, you select from an ever growing list of policies or you create your own. Policies can be grouped in policy initiatives. A single policy or an initiative gets assigned to a scope, which can be a management group, a subscription or a resource group. In the portal, you then check for compliance:

Compliancy? What do I care? It’s just my personal subscription 😁

Besides checking for compliance, you can deny the requests in real time. There are also policies that can create resources when they are missing.

Azure Policy for Kubernetes

Although Azure Policy works great with Azure Resource Manager (ARM), which is basically the API that allows you to interact with Azure resources, it does not work with Kubernetes out of the box. We will need an admission controller (see above) that understands how to interpret Kubernetes API requests in addition to another component that can sync policies in Azure Policy to Kubernetes for the admission controller to pick up. There is a built-in list of supported Kubernetes policies.

For the admission controller, Microsoft uses Gatekeeper v3. There is a lot, and I do mean a LOT, to say about Gatekeeper and its history. We will not go down that path here. Check out this post for more information if you are truly curious. For us it’s enough to know that Gatekeeper v3 needs to be installed on AKS. In order to do that, we can use an AKS add-on. In fact, you should use the add-on if you want to work with Azure Policy. Installing Gatekeeper v3 on its own will not work.

Note: there are ways to configure Azure Policy to work with Azure Arc for Kubernetes and AKS Engine. In this post, we only focus on the managed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

So how do we install the add-on? It is very easy to do with the portal or the Azure CLI. For all details, check out the docs. With the Azure CLI, it is as simple as:

az aks enable-addons --addons azure-policy --name CLUSTERNAME --resource-group RESOURCEGROUP

If you want to do it from an ARM template, just add the add-on to the template as shown here.

What happens after installing the add-on?

I installed the add-on without active policies. In kube-system, you will find the two pods below:

azure-policy and azure-policy-webhook

The above pods are part of the add-on. I am not entirely sure what the azure-policy-webhook does, but the azure-policy pod is responsible for checking Azure Policy for new assignments and translating that to resources that Gatekeeper v3 understands (hint: constraints). It also checks policies on the cluster and reports results back to Azure Policy. In the logs, you will see things like:

  • No audit results found
  • Schedule running
  • Creating constraint

The last line creates a constraint but what exactly is that? Constraints tell GateKeeper v3 what to check for when a request comes to the API server. An example of a constraint is that a container should not run privileged. Constraints are backed by constraint templates that contain the schema and logic of the constraint. Good to know, but where are the Gatekeeper v3 pods?

Gatekeeper pods in the gatekeeper-system namespace

Gatekeeper was automatically installed by the Azure Policy add-on and will work with the constraints created by the add-on, synced from Azure Policy. When you remove these pods, the add-on will install them again.

Creating a policy

Although you normally create policy initiatives, we will create a single policy and see what happens on the cluster. In Azure Policy, choose Assign Policy and scope the policy to the resource group of your cluster. In Policy definition, select Kubernetes cluster should not allow privileged containers. As discussed, that is one of the built-in policies:

Creating a policy that does not allow privileged containers

In the next step, set the effect to deny. This will deny requests in real time. Note that the three namespaces in Namespace exclusions are automatically added. You can add extra namespaces there. You can also specifically target a policy to one or more namespaces or even use a label selector.

Policy parameters

You can now select Review and create and then select Create to create the policy assignment. This is the result:

Policy assigned

Now we have to wait a while for the change to be picked up by the add-on on the cluster. This can take several minutes. After a while, you will see the following log entry in the azure-policy pod:

Creating constraint: azurepolicy-container-no-privilege-blablabla

You can see the constraint when you run k get constraints. The constraint is based on a constraint template. You can list the templates with k get constrainttemplates. This is the result:

constraint templates

With k get constrainttemplates k8sazurecontainernoprivilege -o yaml, you will find that the template contains some logic:

the template’s logic

The block of rego contains the logic of this template. Without knowing rego, which is the policy language used by Open Policy Agent (OPA) which is used by Gatekeeper v3 on our cluster, you can actually guess that the privileged field inside securityContext is checked. If that field is true, that’s a violation of policy. Although it is useful to understand more details about OPA and rego, Azure Policy hides the complexity for you.

Does it work?

Let’s try to deploy the following deployment.yaml:

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
  name: nginx-deployment
    app: nginx
  replicas: 3
      app: nginx
        app: nginx
        - name: nginx
          image: nginx:1.14.2
            - containerPort: 80
            privileged: true

After running kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml, everything seems fine. But when we run kubectl get deploy:

Pods are not coming up

Let’s run kubectl get events:


Notice that denied the request because privileged was set to true.

Adding more policies

Azure Security Center comes with a large initiative, Azure Security Benchmark, that also includes many Kubernetes policies. All of these policies are set to audit for compliance. On my system, the initiative is assigned at the subscription level:

Azure Security Benchmark assigned at subscription level with name Security Center

The Azure Policy add-on on our cluster will pick up the Kubernetes policies and create the templates and constraints:

Several new templates created

Now we have two constraints for k8sazurecontainernoprivilege:

Two constraints: one deny and the other audit

The new constraint comes from the larger initiative. In the spec, the enforcementAction is set to dryrun (audit). Although I do not have pods that violate k8sazurecontainernoprivilege, I do have pods that violate another policy that checks for host path mapping. That is reported back by the add-on in the compliance report:

Yes, akv2k8s maps to /etc/kubernetes on the host


In this post, you have seen what happens when you install the AKS policy add-on and enable a Kubernetes policy in Azure Policy. The add-on creates constraints and constraint templates that Gatekeeper v3 understands. The rego in a constraint template contains logic used to define the policy. When the policy is set to deny, Gatekeeper v3, which is an admission controller denies the request in real-time. When the policy is set to audit (or dry run at the constraint level), audit results are reported by the add-on to Azure Policy.